1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
// Copyright (c) The Diem Core Contributors
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0

#![forbid(unsafe_code)]

use crate::ledger_info::{LedgerInfo, LedgerInfoWithSignatures};
use anyhow::{ensure, format_err, Result};
#[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzzing"))]
use proptest::{collection::vec, prelude::*};
use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};
use std::fmt::Debug;

/// The verification of the epoch change proof starts with verifier that is trusted by the
/// client: could be either a waypoint (upon startup) or a known epoch info.
pub trait Verifier: Debug + Send + Sync {
    /// Verify if the ledger_info is trust worthy.
    fn verify(&self, ledger_info: &LedgerInfoWithSignatures) -> Result<()>;

    /// Returns true in case the given epoch is larger than the existing verifier can support.
    /// In this case the EpochChangeProof should be verified and the verifier updated.
    fn epoch_change_verification_required(&self, epoch: u64) -> bool;

    /// Returns true if the given [`LedgerInfo`] is stale and probably in our
    /// trusted prefix.
    ///
    /// For example, if we have a waypoint with version 5, an epoch change ledger
    /// info with version 3 < 5 is already in our trusted prefix and so we can
    /// ignore it.
    ///
    /// Likewise, if we're in epoch 10 with the corresponding validator set, an
    /// epoch change ledger info with epoch 6 can be safely ignored.
    fn is_ledger_info_stale(&self, ledger_info: &LedgerInfo) -> bool;
}

#[derive(Clone, Debug, Deserialize, Eq, PartialEq, Serialize)]
/// A vector of LedgerInfo with contiguous increasing epoch numbers to prove a sequence of
/// epoch changes from the first LedgerInfo's epoch.
pub struct EpochChangeProof {
    pub ledger_info_with_sigs: Vec<LedgerInfoWithSignatures>,
    pub more: bool,
}
impl EpochChangeProof {
    pub fn new(ledger_info_with_sigs: Vec<LedgerInfoWithSignatures>, more: bool) -> Self {
        Self {
            ledger_info_with_sigs,
            more,
        }
    }

    /// The first/lowest epoch of the proof to indicate which epoch this proof is helping with
    pub fn epoch(&self) -> Result<u64> {
        self.ledger_info_with_sigs
            .first()
            .map(|li| li.ledger_info().epoch())
            .ok_or_else(|| format_err!("Empty EpochChangeProof"))
    }

    /// Verify the proof is correctly chained with known epoch and validator
    /// verifier and return the [`LedgerInfoWithSignatures`] to start target epoch.
    ///
    /// In case a waypoint is present, it's going to be used for verifying the
    /// very first epoch change (it's the responsibility of the caller to not
    /// pass a waypoint in case it's not needed).
    ///
    /// We will also skip any stale ledger info's in the [`EpochChangeProof`].
    pub fn verify(&self, verifier: &dyn Verifier) -> Result<&LedgerInfoWithSignatures> {
        ensure!(
            !self.ledger_info_with_sigs.is_empty(),
            "The EpochChangeProof is empty"
        );
        ensure!(
            !verifier
                .is_ledger_info_stale(self.ledger_info_with_sigs.last().unwrap().ledger_info()),
            "The EpochChangeProof is stale as our verifier is already ahead \
             of the entire EpochChangeProof"
        );
        let mut verifier_ref = verifier;

        for ledger_info_with_sigs in self
            .ledger_info_with_sigs
            .iter()
            // Skip any stale ledger infos in the proof prefix. Note that with
            // the assertion above, we are guaranteed there is at least one
            // non-stale ledger info in the proof.
            //
            // It's useful to skip these stale ledger infos to better allow for
            // concurrent client requests.
            //
            // For example, suppose the following:
            //
            // 1. My current trusted state is at epoch 5.
            // 2. I make two concurrent requests to two validators A and B, who
            //    live at epochs 9 and 11 respectively.
            //
            // If A's response returns first, I will ratchet my trusted state
            // to epoch 9. When B's response returns, I will still be able to
            // ratchet forward to 11 even though B's EpochChangeProof
            // includes a bunch of stale ledger infos (for epochs 5, 6, 7, 8).
            //
            // Of course, if B's response returns first, we will reject A's
            // response as it's completely stale.
            .skip_while(|&ledger_info_with_sigs| {
                verifier.is_ledger_info_stale(ledger_info_with_sigs.ledger_info())
            })
        {
            // Try to verify each (epoch -> epoch + 1) jump in the EpochChangeProof.
            verifier_ref.verify(ledger_info_with_sigs)?;
            // While the original verification could've been via waypoints,
            // all the next epoch changes are verified using the (already
            // trusted) validator sets.
            verifier_ref = ledger_info_with_sigs
                .ledger_info()
                .next_epoch_state()
                .ok_or_else(|| format_err!("LedgerInfo doesn't carry a ValidatorSet"))?;
        }

        Ok(self.ledger_info_with_sigs.last().unwrap())
    }
}

#[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzzing"))]
impl Arbitrary for EpochChangeProof {
    type Parameters = ();
    type Strategy = BoxedStrategy<Self>;

    fn arbitrary_with(_args: Self::Parameters) -> Self::Strategy {
        (vec(any::<LedgerInfoWithSignatures>(), 0..10), any::<bool>())
            .prop_map(|(ledger_infos_with_sigs, more)| Self::new(ledger_infos_with_sigs, more))
            .boxed()
    }
}

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
    use super::*;
    use crate::{block_info::BlockInfo, epoch_state::EpochState, waypoint::Waypoint};

    #[test]
    fn verify_epoch_change_proof() {
        use crate::{ledger_info::LedgerInfo, validator_verifier::random_validator_verifier};
        use diem_crypto::hash::HashValue;
        use std::collections::BTreeMap;

        let all_epoch: Vec<u64> = (1..=10).collect();
        let mut valid_ledger_info = vec![];
        let mut validator_verifier = vec![];

        // We generate end-epoch ledger info for epoch 1 to 10, each signed by the current
        // validator set and carrying the next epoch info.
        let (mut current_signers, mut current_verifier) = random_validator_verifier(1, None, true);
        let mut current_version = 123;
        for epoch in &all_epoch {
            validator_verifier.push(current_verifier.clone());
            let (next_signers, next_verifier) =
                random_validator_verifier((*epoch + 1) as usize, None, true);
            let epoch_state = EpochState {
                epoch: *epoch + 1,
                verifier: next_verifier.clone(),
            };
            let ledger_info = LedgerInfo::new(
                BlockInfo::new(
                    *epoch,
                    0,
                    HashValue::zero(),
                    HashValue::zero(),
                    current_version,
                    0,
                    Some(epoch_state),
                ),
                HashValue::zero(),
            );
            let signatures = current_signers
                .iter()
                .map(|s| (s.author(), s.sign(&ledger_info)))
                .collect();
            valid_ledger_info.push(LedgerInfoWithSignatures::new(ledger_info, signatures));
            current_signers = next_signers;
            current_verifier = next_verifier;
            current_version += 1;
        }

        // Test well-formed proof will succeed
        let proof_1 = EpochChangeProof::new(valid_ledger_info.clone(), /* more = */ false);
        assert!(proof_1
            .verify(&EpochState {
                epoch: all_epoch[0],
                verifier: validator_verifier[0].clone(),
            })
            .is_ok());

        let proof_2 =
            EpochChangeProof::new(valid_ledger_info[2..5].to_vec(), /* more = */ false);
        assert!(proof_2
            .verify(&EpochState {
                epoch: all_epoch[2],
                verifier: validator_verifier[2].clone()
            })
            .is_ok());

        // Test proof with stale prefix will verify
        assert!(proof_1
            .verify(&EpochState {
                epoch: all_epoch[4],
                verifier: validator_verifier[4].clone()
            })
            .is_ok());

        // Test empty proof will fail verification
        let proof_3 = EpochChangeProof::new(vec![], /* more = */ false);
        assert!(proof_3
            .verify(&EpochState {
                epoch: all_epoch[0],
                verifier: validator_verifier[0].clone()
            })
            .is_err());

        // Test non contiguous proof will fail
        let mut list = valid_ledger_info[3..5].to_vec();
        list.extend_from_slice(&valid_ledger_info[8..9]);
        let proof_4 = EpochChangeProof::new(list, /* more = */ false);
        assert!(proof_4
            .verify(&EpochState {
                epoch: all_epoch[3],
                verifier: validator_verifier[3].clone()
            })
            .is_err());

        // Test non increasing proof will fail
        let mut list = valid_ledger_info.clone();
        list.reverse();
        let proof_5 = EpochChangeProof::new(list, /* more = */ false);
        assert!(proof_5
            .verify(&EpochState {
                epoch: all_epoch[9],
                verifier: validator_verifier[9].clone()
            })
            .is_err());

        // Test proof with invalid signatures will fail
        let proof_6 = EpochChangeProof::new(
            vec![LedgerInfoWithSignatures::new(
                valid_ledger_info[0].ledger_info().clone(),
                BTreeMap::new(),
            )],
            /* more = */ false,
        );
        assert!(proof_6
            .verify(&EpochState {
                epoch: all_epoch[0],
                verifier: validator_verifier[0].clone()
            })
            .is_err());

        // Test proof with waypoint corresponding to the first epoch change succeeds.
        let waypoint_for_1_to_2 =
            Waypoint::new_epoch_boundary(valid_ledger_info[0].ledger_info()).unwrap();
        assert!(proof_1.verify(&waypoint_for_1_to_2).is_ok());

        // Test proof with stale prefix will verify with a Waypoint
        let waypoint_for_5_to_6 =
            Waypoint::new_epoch_boundary(valid_ledger_info[4].ledger_info()).unwrap();
        assert!(proof_1.verify(&waypoint_for_5_to_6).is_ok());

        // Waypoint before proof range will fail to verify
        let waypoint_for_3_to_4 =
            Waypoint::new_epoch_boundary(valid_ledger_info[2].ledger_info()).unwrap();
        let proof_7 =
            EpochChangeProof::new(valid_ledger_info[4..8].to_vec(), /* more */ false);
        assert!(proof_7.verify(&waypoint_for_3_to_4).is_err());

        // Waypoint after proof range will fail to verify
        let proof_8 = EpochChangeProof::new(valid_ledger_info[..1].to_vec(), /* more */ false);
        assert!(proof_8.verify(&waypoint_for_3_to_4).is_err());
    }
}